In short
The etiquette problem with notetaker bots is simple: a stranger appears in the call, and nobody has explained it.
For the other side — especially a client — that raises questions they should not have to ask: who is this, is it recording, where does the recording go, and did anyone ask me?
The answer is not a particular tool. It is saying, before or at the start of every client meeting, that you are taking notes and how. This guide covers what the other side experiences, how to handle a bot politely if you use one, and what changes if your notetaker does not join the call.
What the other side sees
From the client's end, a bot looks like this:
- A new participant appears, often before you do, with a name like the vendor's product or "notetaker".
- If the meeting has a waiting room, someone on their side may be asked whether to admit it.
- Depending on the platform, a recording notice may appear.
- Nobody introduces it, because the person it belongs to is busy starting the meeting.
None of that is hostile, but it does put the client in the position of either objecting — which feels confrontational in a sales or advisory relationship — or silently accepting a recording they know nothing about. Many will not say anything. That silence is not agreement.
Some clients' own IT policies also treat outside bots as a risk and hold or block them. Why companies block AI meeting bots covers why. When that happens, the bot's owner is often the last to know.
If you use a bot
Before the meeting
- Say so in the invite. One line: "I use an AI notetaker that records and transcribes our calls so I can send accurate notes. Let me know if you'd rather I didn't."
- Check the client's policy if you are working with a larger organisation. Their security or procurement team may have a view.
- Turn off automatic joining for client meetings until you know the client is comfortable, if your bot joins from your calendar.
At the start
- Introduce it by name before the discussion starts.
- Say where the recording goes and how long you keep it, in one sentence.
- Ask, and wait for an answer. "Are you happy for it to stay?" is a real question.
How to ask for consent to record a meeting has wording for invites, the start of a call and email.
If they say no
Remove the bot straight away, thank them, and take notes by hand. Do not argue for it, and do not replace it with a recorder they cannot see. They objected to being recorded; the method does not change that.
Afterwards
Send the notes. A clear follow-up with decisions and next steps is what justifies taking them. If the notes were written by AI, say so — and read them before sending.
If your notetaker does not join the call
A notetaker that records on your computer — capturing your microphone and what your computer plays — avoids the unexplained tile. There is nothing for the client to admit and nothing in their participant list.
That removes the awkward moment. It does not remove the obligation it was standing in for. With a bot, the client could at least see something. With a recorder on your computer, they cannot tell at all unless you say so. The introduction becomes the only notice they get:
"I'm recording this call on my laptop so I can write up accurate notes afterwards. The audio stays with me. Is that all right?"
Where the law requires everyone's agreement to record, it applies to your laptop just as it does to a bot.
Client calls where recording is a bad idea
Some conversations should not be recorded at all, or only with a written agreement in advance:
- Negotiations where the other side has not agreed to a record.
- Calls touching on legal advice, health or a personnel matter.
- Anything the client has marked confidential, unless their policy allows recording.
In those cases, take notes by hand and send a written summary for them to confirm. That gives both sides a record without a recording.
How Notey handles this
Notey is a Mac app that records your microphone and your Mac's audio as two separate tracks. Nothing joins the call, so there is no tile for the client to query. That is exactly why it asks you to do the announcing:
- It asks you before it records. When a call starts, the floating button says so; nothing is saved until you press Allow.
- The indicator is for you. A red dot and the elapsed time show in the window, the menu bar and the floating button while audio is being kept. The client does not see them.
- The audio stays on your Mac. Transcription happens on the device. If you ask for AI notes, only the transcript's text is sent, and the result is labelled as AI-generated.
Consultants who record client calls routinely will find more on the day-to-day in AI notes for consultants, and the wider trade-offs in bot-free meeting notes.
The short version
- Tell people, before the meeting and at the start.
- Say what records it, where it goes and how long you keep it.
- Take no for an answer, and do not switch tools to get around it.
- Send useful notes afterwards.
Frequently asked questions
Is it rude to bring an AI notetaker bot to a client meeting?
Not if you ask first. What causes friction is a bot that arrives unannounced, with a name the client does not recognise, and records before anyone agreed. Ask in advance or at the start, and remove it if they say no.
What should I say when my notetaker joins a call?
Something short and specific — "That's my notetaker; it records and transcribes so I can write up accurate notes. The recording stays with us. Are you happy for it to stay?" Then act on the answer.
What if the client asks me to remove the bot?
Remove it, and take notes another way. Do not switch to a different recorder they cannot see; the objection was to being recorded, not to one tool.
Is a notetaker that doesn't join the call more polite?
It avoids the unexplained tile, but the other side cannot see it at all. That makes saying you are recording more important, not less.